Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libctl - Guile-based support for flexible control files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210781 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-14 23:28 EST ------- Hi Jason, many thanks for the rapid review! So I can easily push the three header files into a /usr/include/ctl or similarly named directory. And then use -I/usr/include/ctl for the dependant packages (which will be submitted next). If I do that, will you have any objections? Alternatively, we could look through all the packages currently in Core and Extras and convince ourselves that nothing else owns the admittedly very generic-looking /usr/include/ctl.h file -- so that its OK for it to be there. I'm leaning towards the first one but will be OK with either solution (or maybe even an alternative?). Please let me know what you prefer and I'll probably just go ahead and implement it. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
