Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 17:40 EST ------- Robert, at this point I can't commit to extensive testing with otrproxy and britlbee. At this point, either one could be responsible for not working properly. So i will drop by claim for now that britlbee is broken, and hopefully I can test it out when I have some more time. Can you add my accept patch for x86_64 ? I've uploaded it to: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/bitlbee/bitlbee-1.0.3-accept.patch I would still prefer a %configure call, just in case upstream starts adding support for it. There is no reason not to do so (and makes rpmlint happy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
