Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the
Scribes text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211242
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-18 15:39 EST -------
Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes-templates.spec
SRPM:
http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes-templates-20061017-2.src.rpm
The first two issues I've fixed in release 2, linked above.
> By the way, does upstream have a plan to change the numbering of
> "VERSION"? Usually writing date to version is not preferable.
Datestamps like this are the current plan (since they will feasibly not be
updated quite as often as Scribes itself). Why are datestamps like this not
preferred? (There really is no other specific versioning to it...)
Thanks for your suggestions!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
