Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 20:25 EST ------- Apparently my first mail was incorrectly addressed, and gmail's spam filter ate the second one, but TPF President Bill Odom eventually noticed it and gave me this answer: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:13:01 -0600 From: "Bill Odom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steven Pritchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: documentation license question In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve: Okay, here's the definitive word from Allison, who's been immersed in the legal and licensing side for far longer than any one person should ever have to be: On 10/31/06, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The Perl 6 Bible is the Apocalypses, Exegeses, and Synopses. ... >They'll be under the same terms as the production release of Perl 6, >which is: > - they are covered by the author's contributor agreement to TPF > - the compilation copyright is owned by TPF > - authors retain their individual copyright in individual pieces > - Artistic 2.0 license Does that give you what you need, or should I do some more digging? Thanks, Bill -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
