Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 18:04 EST ------- > I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the > time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl > meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is > that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if > they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine > Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three > meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which > in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. It sounds wisely for me, I think it's a good solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
