Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-26 07:49 EST ------- * name right * follow guidelines, legible * license is free software, COPYING included * source match upstream d6cfa1b0d808d5772c9b2798b8a90df0 libtcd-2.2.tar.bz2 * %files section right * library properly packaged * directory owning is right As I said in another post I think that in this a case where keeping the static library makes sense since it could be used to handle trusted data in numerical experiments where compiling statically enhance portability. You can keep it out, as long as you respond favorably to users asking to have it back. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
