Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-08 00:41 EST ------- I'm looking into autotooling this. It's not impossible but I'm going to have to look into the coreconf stuff more closely to make sure I'm not missing something in my initial pass. Some questions: * Why is this package called srvcore-devel? The library looks like it's called libsrvcore so the -devel extension looks extraneous. (This will also cause you packaging headaches as there's usually a main package with the shared libs and a subpackage named %{name}-devel for static libraries and headers. If you did that in this case you'd have svrcore-devel-devel. So you can either rename at the upstream level or the packaging level.) * Is it okay if I change the directory structure or are you still committed to building this in a mozilla tree where the directory structure is important? * Does anyone understand coreconf and want to walk me through it on IRC -- if not, I'll figure it out on my own. It's just a question of speed and assurance that I'm not taking a false start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
