Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 16:33 EST ------- Must items: OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL,LGPL for the jdbc driver) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 59b5f89d0a0230b00d80e779bb517520 postgis-1.2.0.tar.gz 59b5f89d0a0230b00d80e779bb517520 postgis-1.2.0.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files are good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. NOT OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. You need Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version I'll accept the package trusting you'll fix that last item. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
