Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from 
Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-12-29 23:09 EST -------
A couple of comments:

This package has rpath problems:
E: qpidd binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/qpidd ['/usr/lib64']

Loads of undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints from the installed package:
W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0
_ZTIN4qpid7framing11BodyHandlerE
W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0
_ZTIN4qpid3sys8RunnableE
W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0
_ZNK4qpid7framing13AMQMethodBody6encodeERNS0_6BufferE
and 161 others.

Picking nits, I know, but:
BuildReqires: cppunit is redundant.
Requires: apr is also redundant; rpm finds the libapr-1.so.0 dependency
automatically.  Oddly, it doesn't find the boost dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to