Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-31 08:59 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint is silent - MUST: Package is named well - MUST: Spec file name matches the package name - MUST: Package meets packaging guidelines - MUST: Pachage is licensed with GPL - MUST: License field matches actual license - MUST: COPYING file is included in %doc - MUST: Spec is written in English, most probably American (I am not that familiar with the differences to be 100% sure) - MUST: I can understand the spec file - MUST: MD5 sums match - MUST: Package build in mock (fc6/i386) - MUST: I can't check other architectures - MUST: All deps are listed in BR - MUST: %find_lang is used - MUST: Package does not contain shared libs - MUST: Package is not relocatable - MUST: Directory ownership is ok - MUST: There are no duplicates in %files - MUST: Permissions are OK - MUST: Clean section is present - MUST: Macros are used consistently - MUST: Package contains code - MUST: There is no large documentation - MUST: %doc is not required at runtime - MUST: There is no headers nor static libs - MUST: No pkgconfig files - MUST: There is no shared libs - MUST: There is no -devel subpackage - MUST: There is no libtool archives - MUST: Not a GUI app - MUST: Pachage does not own dirs owned by other packages SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: License is included - SHOULD: There are not translantions - SHOULD: Package builds in mock (fc6/i386) - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - SHOULD: Package works (smoke tested on fc6/i386) - SHOULD: Scriptlets are not used - SHOULD: There is no devel subpackage - SHOULD: There are no pkgconfig files APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
