Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 12:56 EST ------- My argument for maybe packaging libgnomescan separately is that if someone produces another scanning application, and depends on gnomescan-devel we suddenly have two different scanning applications installed, since gnomescan-devel depends on gnomescan. It is probably a minor detail at this, and is all depends on how you expect libgnomescan to be used by other applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
