Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-11 16:50 EST -------
More importantly, one should note that the example:
desktop-file-install --vendor=""                                 \
        --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/<vendor_id>   \
        %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/<vendor_id>/foo.desktop

Is (almost) a no-op, other than serving as a sanity-check/validator for the
.desktop file (ie, dfi will barf if it finds something non-compliant).

Now, how to (re)word this to make it clear fdi is not a MUST item, while at the
same time maximizing confusion... (:


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to