Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-17 22:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) 1. ok. 2. ok. 3. ok. 4. ok. Yeah, libgsf-gnome-devel was split off recently in devel. 5. ok. 6. ok. 7. ok. All makes sense. 8. ok. 9. >> 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release. >> Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package? >> That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated. > >Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash- docs. Well, for instance if you have Requires: gnucash-docs = 2.0.1 now, you can upgrade the main package without needing docs updates until the next time they update the docs. I don't know how often upstream updates the main package without the docs also being updated however, so this might not be worth the trouble. A few additional items: - There is a 'Requires: qbanking'. Nothing currently provides that... Should that be 'aqbanking'? Any particular version? - Oddly the changes you made in the rpath disabling seem to have fixed whatever I was seeing with the smp_mflags not working. This cuts buildtime here from about 70min to about 23min. Can you confirm adding smp_mflags works now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
