Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and 
financial data import/export


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-18 08:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
>  (In reply to comment #12)
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm
> > E: aqbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci
> > - aqbanking needs to also 'Provides: aqhbci'
> 
> How does this help? Anything that actually used the old aqhbci will
> not work even if this did provide it - different ABI, different interface,
> different paths to the binaries used. I believe this falls under the '[not] a
> compatible enough replacement' category of the provides/obsoletes draft.
> 
The way I always read Obsolete/Provides is that its meant for people installing
the software, not programs using it. Thus if someone doesn't know aqhbci had
been obsoleted type 'yum install aqhbci', he'll get aqbanking because of 
Provides.
> 
> Uploaded as -14.
Look like you inadvertently use the %doc macro under aqbanking files section
again, that will clean out the directory before packaging it ;). Just listing
the directory without the %doc will do.

I believe the package is OK after doing that.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to