Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 01:52 EST ------- Is there a reason that one package is called phpdoc and not php-pear-PhpDocumentor? The source looks to all be from PhpDocumentor.tgz. I realize phpdoc is the name of the binary, and can be run from the command line, but it seems odd to me to have one source rpm produce packages of completely different names. Also, is the web interface enabled by default? I didn't see anyting in /etc/httpd/conf.d. I guess I thought something like #Created for PhpDocumentor package Alias /phpdoc '/usr/share/pear/data/PhpDocumentor' <Directory /phpdoc> Options -Indexes </Directory> I am not sure if enabling this on the web by default is allowed (encouraged) though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
