Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-24 23:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) [..] > * fields Source0 must be point to the full location of the tarball for check > up. While this is generally true, it is not the case for source snapshots (unless there is a valid URL for it, such as some projects' nightly or weekly CVS tarballs). (In reply to comment #0) > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea > E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777 Why are these /mnt directories needed? If they are valid, would they be better as locations in /srv or similar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
