Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-26 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Can't the conflict between libtorrent <-> this package be > avoided simply by moving > * /usr/lib/libtorrent.so -> /usr/lib/librb_torrent.so > * /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc -> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/librb_torrent.pc > [...] > ? Unfortunately, it is not necessarily that simple, as this would require all packages building against it to be reconfigured to use the 'rb_libtorrent' naming (patching the necessary build scripts), whereas other distributions maintain the simple conflict and note that it is different from the Rakshasa library of the same name. One of my ideals is to, within reason, keep the packaging of a piece of software very similar between distributions; and having to maintain a Fedora-specific patching to it (as well as anything that would potentially build/link against it, such as python-libtorrent) would give us harm us in terms of this packaging difference more than the no-Conflicts help it would bring us. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
