Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: chkconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225641 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-03 16:49 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * File list of chkconfig looks OK * File list of ntsysv looks OK Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: newt (by newt-devel) Notes: * Please use {?dist} in the Release tag * I'm not sure what BuildPrereq does, but can you use BuildReq? * Can you use make DESTDIR instead of make instroot * Replace /etc with %{_sysconfdir} and /usr/sbin with %{_sbindir} rpmlint output is not silent: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chkconfig]$ cat rpmlint-srpm.log W: chkconfig no-url-tag W: chkconfig buildprereq-use newt newt-devel gettext W: chkconfig macro-in-%changelog pre W: chkconfig macro-in-%changelog pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
