Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: unix2dos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226514 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-06 12:31 EST ------- Hi Tim, > Not sure what I need to change for this. To preserve timestamps, use install -p or cp -p > Got a better summary I can put in there? "UNIX to DOS text file format converter" sounds good to me One of the guidelines is to not repeat the name of the package in the summary, that's all. > It comes with its own COPYRIGHT file, which is not a canned license. What > should I put for 'License:'? I'm not sure what rpmlint thinks are valid licenses. Distributable will do. > No upstream any more as far as I can tell. That's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
