Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bg - Bulgarian hunspell dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 10:30 EST ------- - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream , sha1sum 949cff5c527a1dd8c0ec4b6035a34a50e81ec7af bg_BG.zip - the package builds in mock, devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files) - the license GPL stated in the tag seems identical to the one included (in Bulgarian..) in the sources - there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - rpmlint is silent on both source and binary rpm - code, not content - no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 2.5K text file - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
