Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-14 11:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Could you please add a comment explaining how you generated the > cvs snapshot such that sources may be checked. After checking it out from cvs I did: autoreconf ./configure make dist what generated the source tarball for me. I renamed it to reflect that it's not an official release, but a prerelease made from a CVS snapshot. > Also I think that it would be better to remove the .gz in > install-info scriptlets. No problem to remove it. > Also I suggest adding a Requires for latex2html, and maybe for > tetex-tex4ht (after the merge). I'm going to add the latex2html Requires. I'm not quite sure we want to add tex4ht dependency as it's not in Core and used only in examples? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
