Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Fedora Directory Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228555





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-14 11:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> > * Release should be 0.1.%{cvsdate}%{?dist}
> > 
> Guidelines dont mention where the disttag should go in this case.  I think 
> its 
> fine as is.

The current release tag of 0.1.%{?dist}%{?cvsdate} will expand to
0.1..fc720070213 if build in the Extras buildsystem, since the expansion of
%{?dist} includes a leading dot.

The DistTag page (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag), which is
referenced from the package naming guidelines page
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) says:

  "Basically, follow the Packaging/NamingGuidelines for how to set the
   value for Release, then append %{?dist} to the end."

So I think that the guidelines do say where to put the dist tag and Comment #5
is right.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to