Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-15 20:39 EST ------- OK, I think that settles it. Though it would be nice to satisfy concern 2) as well, the simplicity of this compromise probably outweighs the downsides of a split libgcj. I'm closing this WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
