Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229319 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-20 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The Bushido-Yellow-theme from the tarball does not do its masking properly (on > my system at least) - it cuts out the central window titlebar-area, making it > impossible to see the window title. I will see if I can edit the masks to make > it work properly, otherwise, I'll remove the references from the help file > (the > other themes also demonstrate masking anyway). > The theme is also available here: > http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=32163 > ...but this version is not compatible with dekorator 0.3. > > As for the "K-style: Infinity" theme: the version packaged with dekorator is > broken, according to its author: > http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35590 > I think a separate package for this theme (using the updated source) would be > better. > Ok, I'm good with the explanations given. Can you include a "dekorator.fedora" file to the package which explains this choice. This "dekorator.fedora" file will be included in %doc > Simply because it's, well, ugly ;-), and obviously designed to be a teaching > example, not an _actual_ theme... Should I rather install this by default? Or > maybe put it in a subpackage? I was wondering about the "template" theme as > well, but at least that one's usable and semi-nice to look at. If this "ugly" theme isn't broken, I would like it to be installed as a theme. We should not forget that our users aren't stupid, they might be waiting to see it included. :) > I agree, this is *very* irritating. I will look into this; it shouldn't be too > hard. I have a question, though: do you think I should make it so that the > "Set > Theme Path" button's actions are automatically performed when the user selects a theme from the list (and thus remove the button completely)? Or should the > program only select an initial default theme, and leave the "set theme path" > button as it is? Personally I feel the "set theme path" button is an > unnecessary > and unintuitive step and should be removed, but someone else's opinion would > be > greatly appreciated. If you can do it, why not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
