Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-01 14:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually, now that I look at the -2 version of the spec file, it seems to me > that I may have misunderstood the %{python_sitelib} usage on the Packaging > Python page. This directory holds pure python stuff, right? It's not meant as > a > replacement for /usr/share/packagename (i.e. architecture independent files)? > Or > is it? You will see packaging done in both places. Certainly "module" type packages will live in the sitelib (like the subversion bindings). I believe that for applications like this is is more a matter of taste. I'm no python expert (or packing expert), but I just recently finished TMDA package that lives in sitelib. Some people believe that /usr/share is strictly for arch independent data files (not program). And just as an example: MoinMoin (web wiki) : sitelib Yum : %{datadir} Your packages templates should definately live in %{datadir} though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
