Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: thunar-volman - Automatic management of removable drives and media for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229930 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-03 22:47 EST ------- Sorry it took so long for me to chime in on this one... 1. I don't think I care much. Sticking with the upstream name has some value however (ie, people reading upstream docs will look for that package name, etc), so I think it's marginally better to stick with thunar-volman. 2. Is thunar-volman useful in any way by itself or to other programs? If it's just simply a Thunar plugin only, then libexecdir does make more sense. If it's useful otherwise, then perhaps bindir is ok. Have you had a chance to bring this up to upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
