Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: maven-shared-1.0-4jpp - Maven Shared Components


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227083


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]           |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-12 20:07 EST -------
New SPEC and SRPM:

http://people.redhat.com/dbhole/fedora/maven-shared/maven-shared.spec
http://people.redhat.com/dbhole/fedora/maven-shared/maven-shared-1.0-4jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm

I...

- Fixed the gcj line
- Disabled the tests for now (getting NPE in junit code somewhere..)
- Separated the javadocs into proper subpackages
- Updated site
- Fixed BR's

E: maven-shared no-binary
W: maven-shared no-documentation
W: maven-shared-file-management no-documentation
W: maven-shared-file-management-javadoc non-standard-group 
Development/Documentation
E: maven-shared-file-management-javadoc zero-length
/usr/share/javadoc/maven-shared-file-management-1.0/package-list
W: maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness no-documentation
W: maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness-javadoc non-standard-group
Development/Documentation
E: maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness-javadoc zero-length
/usr/share/javadoc/maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness-1.0/package-list
W: maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness-javadoc filename-too-long-for-joliet
maven-shared-plugin-testing-harness-javadoc-1.0-4jpp.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm

First error is ok to ignore because the first package is just namesake. There is
no shared jar upstream, just various subjars.

Second and third errors are about autogenerated files, which are beyond packager
control.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to