Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: queuegraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233942 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |urgent Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-27 00:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > ISSUE - License See (1) below > > 1) Only the queugraph.cgi is explicitly GPL the other scripts say nothing > > about > > "other" script is queuegraph-rrd.sh > > queuegraph-rrd.sh appears to have been originally posted here: > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-07/1527.html as mailqsize > with no license information. > > If this is a problem, I can rewrite it in perl :) > > The 3 lines from the original program are: a) the location of postfix and b) > the > find over the 2 types of queues > > Jason Thomas added the rrd file creation from create.sh. > > I'm not sure any of this qualifies as original works. Okay I agree, not sure what I was thinking. > > a license and I was unable to find anything on the queuegraph website. > > Maybe > > talk to upstream about including a COPYING file ? > > > 2) %dir needed for %{_datadir}/queuegraph > > I'm using %{_datadir}/queuegraph so that the cgi file is included as well. By > not specifying %dir, I get directory ownership and file ownership in the > glob. > > You can see that the directory is owned with 'rpm -qpl <package>'. My Mistake, its good to learn something new. It looks good so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
