Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-19 11:28 EST ------- Point well taken. That text is also in the source file (lib/DBIx/POS.pm) itself. The author intends to license this module under perl terms (dual GPL/Artistic) under the clear text of the licensing statement, and this module includes code copyrighted under a strictly Artistic license. This is a not derivative work, however, not a modification of the package Class::Singleton, so this appears to me to be kosher under the Artistic license. It is my assessment that this package (DBIx-POS) is properly licensed by the author under both the GPL and the Artistic license. This is just based on my reading of the Artistic license -- that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this package under the terms of the GPL). Comment is invited :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
