Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the 
GNU system
Alias: gmediaserver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|normal                      |medium




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-19 16:36 EST -------
I am sorry, I was very bussy last time, so I can not fix/update package.

(In reply to comment #20)
>  [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that 
> are
> listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
>      Build is not picking up the uuid libraries.  These are not the ossp-uuid
> libraries that you added to the BR, but the e2fsprogs uuid libraries.  Please
> remove uuid-devel from the BR and add e2pfsprogs-devel.  BR also does not
> contain pkgconfig which is required for the uuid detection.
I wrote BRs based on configure. Now it is fixed.
> 1.  Package source file timestamp does not match upstream.  Consider 
> downloading
> with "wget -N".
Update sources (download by wget -cN ....)
> 2.  Missing/incorrect BR noted above.
Fixed
> 3.  init file line wraps on line 4-5, please pick a better break point
I set break point in description between sentences.
> 4.  init file / LSB info requires $syslog - not needed since it does not use
syslog
Deleted

http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver.spec
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver-0.12.0-7.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to