Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias| |perl-PDF-API2 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-23 22:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > In particular when you review this package, please pay attention to: > 1) Licenses - multiple licenses > 2) Patents - patent statements regarding PDF technology > 3) Fonts - inclusion of fonts in package > 4) Win32.pm - I removed these to not trigger additional dependencies > > Please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong here. It all sounds good, but when I read "patents" I get a little nervous. :) Can you elaboborate? Is there a particular part of the package we should review for this? (e.g. the fonts / PDF itself / etc) "Go read file FOO in the package" is a legit answer here... I'm just looking for a little guidance before beginning a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
