Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-09 14:06 EST ------- Wow..!! It seem that the link above point to the obsolete built package. here is the right below. SRPM: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/gammu-1.10.0-1.fc6.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint output from main package: -------------------------------------------------- W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data ------------------------------------------------------------- These files are examples script that the end-user can use for more accebilities in his action with the Gammu command line. These files shouldn't be removed from its default executable permission. These above warning are harmless and can be ignored. --- > I saw neither python-gammu nor wammu uses gammu-libs rpm. So is there any > other > package needs gammu-libs? > any reason to have separate -libs rpms? As the upstream/developer mentioned for the build, the package can be build with or without share libraries where share libraries could be use with other applications that aim to work with gammu-libs for developing (such as framework, plugin, GUI, ...). In this case, no...detached libs is not a bad thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
