Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [email protected] Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qt4-theme-quarticurve.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qt4-theme-quarticurve-0.0-0.1.beta3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Quarticurve is an unofficial port of Red Hat's Bluecurve Qt 3 widget theme (taken out of redhat-artwork 5.0.12) to Qt 4. This port is NOT endorsed or supported by Red Hat. This will become particularly useful for Fedora 8 when KDE 4 will (hopefully) become the default, but I'm planning to push this to F7 and FE6 too. I also have a KWin theme ready, but that can't get in before the KDE 4 version of KWin does. :-) I hope the way "Bluecurve" is referred to is fair use of the trademark, otherwise I'm willing to work out something with Red Hat. Upsetting Red Hat really isn't the goal here. ;-) rpmlint reports no warnings except those harmless ones for the debuginfo package: W: qt4-theme-quarticurve-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/quarticurve-beta3/.moc W: qt4-theme-quarticurve-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/quarticurve-beta3/.moc And in case that it isn't obvious, the Contribution here is supposed to be the packaging, not the upstream source code, even though I happen to be upstream. (The upstream code is GPL v2, so no licensing issues there.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
