Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sugar-presence-service - Sugar presence service


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244373


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-18 09:45 EST -------
>I see that sugar owns %{_datadir}/sugar/, but I didn't verify that it owns
>%{_datadir}/sugar/services/. If it doesn't then you'll need to make this 
>package
>own it. If it does then you'll need to make this package Require sugar.

I'm not really sure what to do here. Sugar install other services in
%{_datadir}/sugar/services/ so I guess it should own the dir. Though the
presence service should not require Sugar.

Maybe the sources should be fixed to install in
%{_datadir}/sugar-presence-service. CCing Dan about it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to