Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: olpc-utils - various utilities used by OLPC but not packaged anywhere else https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244908 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-23 03:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > As the spec file indicates you can consider the source within the SRPM as > authoritative for now till J5 gets to fix rest of upstream issues. Ok. No problem with that. At the same time, to me, not having the configure.ac to understand how the configure was generated is a blocker for a release in fedora. > Is there any > problems specific to the spec file left? spec seems right to me. But it is possible to have upstream issues that block a release in fedora, and in that case I think that not having configure.ac in upstream tarball (even if it is only in the srpm, no problem with that) is a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
