Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-31 18:33 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 5026bdaf644178fee66a26190453b0dddb99558b8c97c4a592a482a2434dc862 xf86-video-via-0.2.2.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 I think these are problematic. Or is there some reason an ldconfig pass isn't needed here? W: xorg-x11-drv-via-devel no-documentation W: xorg-x11-drv-via mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 3) Not problematic. Plus 56 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints in /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 and /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0. I note that the same issues are present in the XvMC libs from the i810 driver. Maybe there's something special about XvMC libraries? * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
