Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-01 12:08 EST ------- * all releases are named T.x.y[.z] so there may be B.02.12 < B.02.20 < C.03.01 * lshw is trying to be self-contained so it doesn't require dmidecode, lspci, etc. cheers, Lyonel. (In reply to comment #24) > > Just one thing: the version is B.02.11, not 2.11. Please stick to the > > official > > version numbers to prevent confusion and problems with upgrades (RPM seems > > to > > think that B.02.11 < 2.04). > > Ok, will your next major release be C.x.y or 1.0.x? > > Different issue: does lshw need dmidecode or other tools to work? > > - Terje > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
