Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 03:30 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #24) > > See configure file for this. > > You mean the PACKAGE_NAME? > The tarball is slony1-1.2.10.tar.bz2, the upstream project is called Slony-I, and the first line of the README file says Slony-I. From > the NamingGuidelines: > When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. Ok, I committed a bunch of fixes to Slony-I: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001953.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001954.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001955.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001956.html http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2007-August/001957.html > > Missing yacc parser.y parser.c > >> ? No idea what this means. > yacc is provided by bison, and seems to be used by Slony-I: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ Ok, added as BR. > > - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires > >> I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc? > > configure is searching for it, so I assume it is used. It is not a must... But ok, added it. > > Some people may skip doc builds. > But doc is a separate package in Fedora, and people can just choose to not install it. I will make this change, since AFAIR RHEL 5, Fedora 6,7 and 8 does not have the NAMELEN problem. I won't push it to RHEL 4. > > Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break > > This won't be a problem when the package is build on the Fedora buildservers. I understand that you want to maintain one upstream > specfile for all versions of Red Hat and Fedora, but having a clean spec in Fedora makes things more easier in the long run. Yes, I want to maintain 1 spec file. If this is not a blocker, I would like to skip it. > A few other comments: > > - Double BuildRequires for docbook-style-dsssl Good catch :) Removed. > - Is %kerbdir still needed? If not, there's no need to change CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS and a simple %configure will do. > %kerbdir is broken in RHEL3, that's why we keep it. Yes, one spec file for all platforms :) > rpmlint of postgresql-slony1-engine-docs: > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/support 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/adminguide > 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/concept 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/howto 0644 > E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs- > 1.2.10/implementation 0644 Some of them are fixed. However... 1.2.11 was already released, and I committed the changes after that :( That may mean that we will wait another release to test some of the changes. I will post the updated srpm and spec file shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
