Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |4Suite ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 09:44 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #63) > i disagree that SE-PostgreSQL is thought of as a replacement of PostgreSQL. > furthermore, that concern could be addressed with adding sufficient warning to > SE-PostgreSQL's %description. How many people read the %description parts, guys? > i think the reasonable conclusion is that SE-PostgreSQL is broken somewhere > and to switch back to PostgreSQL. As I wrote before, this means a downtime , and usually There Is No Time For Downtime. > Fedora is on the leading edge of SELinux development, and thus is a perfect > place to test this extension of PostgreSQL. Fedora is not the place to test a replacement for PostgreSQL. We are talking about a database server guys, not a browser, or text editor, or such. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
