Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pharosc - VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263121 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 18:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > # Quick comment > > * some files which're installed in subpackage (such as README, templates/) > should be marked as %doc Actually it is simple to say but it complicates usage as README and templates may come from different folders from the same subpackage. Each folder entails a particular set of files and images. The latter forms a what so called "technology". Moving files from right to left will mix up technology descriptions. I believe it's a bad idea to add it as %doc > * Just add a quick comment in %build stage even if there's no build action. I thought having marked the package as noarch made it explicit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
