Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]    |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-08 03:21 EST -------
- naming: ok (debian also uses a lowercase name)
- rpmlint: ok (silent)
- source: ok
cc458a9154f6b8c6da9fae16627beec4  NetPIPE-3.7.1.tar.gz
cc458a9154f6b8c6da9fae16627beec4  NetPIPE-3.7.1.tar.gz.1
- BuildRoot: ok
- Package compiles in koji for all supported archs
- License: NEEDSWORK
You use  GPLv2+, but I cannot find any information on the version of the
license, the header in some source files only mention GPL, but no version and so
does README. Also no license text is included. 
These files do not contain any license header, but some contain an author:
shmem.c
MP_memcpy.c
mpi2.c
gpshmem.c
gm.c
armci.c

Would you please ask upstream to update the license header (and the manpage and
README) to a specific GPL Version, add a license header to the mentioned files
and include the license text in the tarball?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to