Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-08 12:57 EST ------- I am the tetex-tex4ht maintainer, and indeed using ht as a program name is not a good idea. tetex-tex4ht in fact contains many executables, some with trivial names, I'll try to talk to upstream. In the mean time I don't know exactly what could be done. In debian tex4ht there are much less programs, but still ht. This is also true for ht, upstream should try to find a more descriptive name. The %{_bindir} namespace has to be shared among all the applications, more care should be taken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
