Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-11 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Using dbench_version instead of a plain %{version} > seems strange to me but not a blocker. > > BuildRequires: glibc-headers > is unusefull (and may be harmful if the split change), > it should be in every build root. In my opinion this is > a blocker. > yes. you are right. Thought its needed as BR. But mock built successfully without this BR. > I would modify the %description like this (only a > suggestion): > > Dbench is a file system benchmark that generates load patterns similar > to those of the commercial Netbench benchmark. > > > No other comments from me. Rahul, Can you please resubmit new SRPM links for review? Or you can do this at initial package import time also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
