Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-18 08:03 EST -------
Few more suggestion I got 
1) change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-.root.root,-)
Though nothing specific written in guidelines but SPEC given under section 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee
said like that.

2) Usage of parallel make
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e

3) rpmlint on binary rpm gave me
libgssglue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgssglue.so.1.0.0
This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing
a call to ldconfig.

libgssglue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgssglue.so.1.0.0
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing
a call to ldconfig.

check
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-d0dbcb7eec27622a21df280009c5b089b02f5bef

4) Mix of 3 licenses summarizes to GPL+ which I take it as correct usage for
License tag.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to