Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-18 14:16 EST ------- For 2.12.2.1-4: * rpmlint - rpmlint complains about lots of undefined-non-weak-symbols. ----------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint calc-libs calc-libs.i386: W: no-documentation calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 _zeroval_ calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 conf calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 _oneval_ calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 qalloc (and so many) calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcalc.so.2.12.2.1 cust calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcalc.so.2.12.2.1 rl_readline_name (and so many) ------------------------------------------------------ This will cause linkage failure against these libraries and cannot be accepted (if you want to provide -devel subpackage). * Documents - For this package, the "core" package is calc-libs. i.e. all other packages depend on calc-libs, and even one can try to install only calc-libs and try not to install calc. So there can be the case in which no documents like license texts are installed, which is not proper. In short, license texts and so on must be moved to -libs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
