Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-24 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything GPL'ed. > > => There is no license violation. > > Linking does not matter in this case because the original Artistic license, > which is the license for the source code in this package, is not accepted in > Fedora (by itself), no matter what it is linked to or not. > > (In reply to comment #4) > > I already asked same license name to spot in PM and he told me for CPAN > > modules > > its allowed to use "GPL+ or Artistic." > > That's incorrect. Or more specifically, it's a too broad statement - "GPL+ or > Artistic" is what we can use when upstream says "Licensed under the same > license > as Perl itself", which is very common for CPAN stuff. But in this case, > upstream specifically says "Perl Artistic License" (which is not the same > thing > as "same License as Perl" which would be the "GPL+ or Artistic" case) and > doesn't mention GPL at all, we cannot go ahead and claim it's GPL or add GPL to it. Sorry. My misunderstandings. I understood above thing correctly now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
