Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for the Redet tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398261


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-25 06:25 EST -------
There is no explicit license for the manual (as far as I can
tell), so I guess that GPLv2 like for redet is the best choice
for the license?

I would suggest dropping the %{?dist} since this is not dist
specific.

I would also suggest dropping the dependency on redet. One
may want to browse the documentation without having redet 
installed. You could add a conflict for older redet versions,
but I don't think it is worth it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to