Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-setools - SETools Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390571 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-30 11:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I have been creating Source0 by an export from svn and creating a tar from > that > - as noted in the SPEC file (lines 28-34). I'm wondering if it would be > better > to actually build and post the source tarball and use that as Source0 to avoid > the svn1997 stuff in the RPM name. You are saying that you are the upstream and you can put the 3.3.2 tarball somewhere so that we can download it directly? It is very preferable. > > I think I understand what you are saying. > You are saying that because the source is pulled from svn use the svn1997 > naming > for the RPM. Yes. > But, once the 3.3.2 version is released (and tarball posted) then change the > Source0 to reference to tarball and RPM name to 3.3.2-X. Yes, but this means that the formal 3.3.2 is *not yet released*? If my understanding is correct, for now use must use 3.3.2-0.X.svnYYYY. We expects: 3.3.2-0.1.svn1998 -> 3.3.2-0.2.svn1998 -> 3.3.2-0.3.svn2000 -> 3.3.2-0.4.svn2002 -> (3.3.2 tarball is released) -> 3.3.2-1 -> 3.3.2-2 -> .. -> 3.3.3-0.1.svn2100 -> .... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
