Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 13:57 EST ------- I uploaded the updated spec file and source rpm [1], but I'm sure there's going to be the same problem with xqilla license here again -- source rpm contains sources for xqilla with the old mapm library license (same problem as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376541#c9). I could probably split the sources of the dbxml library from the source tarball and put it somewhere on the internet (sf.net for example) -- that way I'd solve the problem with xqilla, I would crop the size of the source rpm to ~33% of it's original size (no sources for db4, xerces-c and xqilla) and I could incorporate some of the patches I had created. It wouldn't be a violation of the dbxml license, but it would be a project fork. Another solution would be asking Oracle for help -- either have them include the new mapm license and repack the source tarball, or have them split sources of dbxml library from the original tarball and put it on their web (IMO very unlikely to happen). Any suggestions from Fedora authorities? [1] http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
