Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426452 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-21 11:39 EST ------- > or if the package was named libgvfs That would go against the mandate to name the package according to the upstream name. I have no problem with doing the gvfs-libs split, and only leave the cmdline tools in the main package, if you think thats a good idea. It would be another example of the main package requiring the subpackage, not vice versa, though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
